@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@COMMENT This file came from Hans Georg Krauthäuser's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://tu-dresden.de/et/tet
@InProceedings{Krauthaeuser05a,
  author =	 {Krauthäuser, H.G. and Winzerling, T. and Nitsch, J.},
  booktitle =	 {Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005. 2005
                  International Symposium on},
  title =	 {Statistical interpretation of autocorrelation
                  coefficients for fields in mode-stirred chambers},
  year =	 2005,
  month =	 aug,
  volume =	 2,
  address =	 {Chicago, USA},
  pages =	 {550 -- 555},
  abstract =	 {The autocorrelation function of electrical field
                  strengths for different boundary conditions (tuner
                  positions) at a given special position is proposed
                  in the IEC standard 61000-4-21 as a measure for the
                  determination of the number of uncorrelated boundary
                  conditions in mode-stirred chambers. Additionally,
                  an upper limit for the autocorrelation coefficient
                  is given for a fixed number N of measured tuner
                  positions only. In this paper, we analyze an
                  approach given in the literature that includes the
                  treatment of different N, but still gives results
                  that are inconsistent with the daily measurement
                  practice in mode-stirred chambers. A slight
                  modification of this approach is proposed that leads
                  to consistent results. This paper gives critical
                  values for the autocorrelation coefficients for any
                  number of measured tuner positions based on a
                  statistical analysis of the well known probability
                  distribution of autocorrelation coefficients. The
                  degree of determination and the significance level
                  remain as free parameters that have to be
                  established by the community. The authors propose
                  values for these parameters that are consistent with
                  the example given in the standard},
  keywords =	 {autocorrelation coefficients;mode-stirred
                  chambers;probability distribution;statistical
                  analysis;statistical interpretation;reverberation
                  chambers;statistical distributions;},
  doi =		 {10.1109/ISEMC.2005.1513576},
  ISSN =	 {0-7803-9380-5},
}